For the last two months, since we opened up the filthy comment section here, I have been heckled and jeered for saying I dared to think Roy Moore had credible accusers. In particular, I noted my concerns about the woman who, at 14, claimed Moore inappropriately touched her.
Many of you screamed to the rafters that she made it all up and I was just consumed by my "Never Trump" behavior.
Marlow also stressed that he was personally uncomfortable with the behavior attributed by The Post to Moore, and noted that he did believe the accusations from Leigh Corfman, who said Moore assaulted her while she was 14 -- they were "not perfect," he said, but had "a lot of credibility."
So, Breitbart's editor covered for a man when he thought there was "a lot of credibility" in accusations of child molestation against him.
I'm wondering how many of you did the same and why anyone should treat you seriously moving forward. Also, why should anyone treat Breitbart seriously moving forward.