Nothing has changed about the internet really -- nothing. And there have been no documented cases of needing "net neutrality." In fact, all the cases the left points to were resolved through existing regulation and law. They have no case, but the secular idol worshippers worship this thing called net neutrality.
And now they're going after Ajit Pai, the FCC Chairman, again. They've previously harassed his family for him daring to scrap the net neutrality regulations. This is the overwrought nonsense being pushed by the hysterical children.
“I like Ajit Pai personally, although I don’t want to defend him in public,” admits another net neutrality supporter. “But you’re not allowed to try to destroy the internet and then be treated well by the internet. The internet should hate him.”
Back before people got mad at you for calling things retarded, this would have been called retarded. Now we can just call it the childish antic of a zealot without a clue. There is no proof that net neutrality is needed. What the left decided to do was pre-emptively regulate the internet in ways that could stifle its growth and competition. All their cited horror stories from Europe were actually cases where internet services were prioritized to help poorer customers.
The whole argument of "net neutrality" is really a nonsensical argument based on hypothetical nightmares by a group of people who deeply distrust the free market and capitalism generally.