Login

Veterans Groups Puzzled, Wish to Be Consulted on Next VA Secretary Nominee

Veterans groups wish to be in the loop, regarding who will ultimately lead the Veterans Administration.

Here’s a thought for the Trump administration, while considering who to put over the Department of Veterans Affairs, next.

At least, that’s the advice of veterans groups around the nation.

The various veterans organizations are urging President Trump to find someone qualified to fill the leadership vacuum left by the ousting of David Shulkin.

And no, Rear Adm. Ronny Jackson wasn’t their idea of “qualified.”

The collapse of Jackson’s nomination was vexing but totally predictable, multiple veterans advocates told the Washington Examiner. Even before allegations of misconduct were made against him, Democrats and Republicans voiced concerns surrounding his lack of experience.

“We didn’t think it was a good idea for them to just let Secretary Shulkin go,” said Carl Blake, executive director of the Paralyzed Veterans of America. “Then [Rear] Adm. Jackson came out of left field for everybody. Literally everybody.”

The part that seems to be sticking in the craw of the leadership of over a half-dozen veterans groups around Washington, D.C. is that neither the president, nor officials from the Department of Veterans Affairs have sought out their advice or made them a part of the conversation, regarding filling the position of Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

Shulkin was ousted after controversy surrounding a taxpayer funded trip to Europe. There was also considerable friction, due to his feet-dragging, regarding expanding care for veterans outside of the VA system.

“Nobody contacted us to discuss nominees. That’s their prerogative, but we represent 2 million American veterans in every legislative district in the country. So I think we’re pretty finely tuned in to how the VA works, and what veterans want,” explained a spokesman for the American Legion.

Ed Zackery, director of an Ohio-based Veterans Service Organization, said his organization has heard from the VA and administration officials “from time to time” on matters related to care for veterans. “But they didn’t reach out to us on this, which we were surprised about,” he said, expressing hope that he might be contacted this time around.

The question of who has the experience and know-how to manage what is the second largest department in our government is now on the table.

The Department of Veterans Affairs has over 360,000 employees and a $200 billion budget. It demands someone with considerable knowledge and experience, as well as a heart to do the work required for our nation’s veterans.

For now, the acting secretary is Robert Wilkie. Many feel he may be offered the job on a permanent basis.

Other names have been floated, however.

Back in March, around the time of Shulkin’s ouster, Energy Department Secretary Rick Perry was a name that came up often.

The former Texas Governor is an Air Force veteran, himself, and is well-known for his efforts on behalf of the nation’s veterans. It’s actually rather unfathomable that he was offered the position as Energy secretary, and not the position with Veterans Affairs, to begin with.

Some are suggesting Perry now, but it’s unclear if that’s who Trump is referring to, when he says he already has someone in mind.

It’s also unlikely that Perry is going to ask for the job.

“The boss likes him a lot, but the boss turned him down for DOD and DHS, so the boss’ affection only goes so far,” said a source close to Perry, who described his current role as “a great retirement gig for the former governor of Texas.”

Tom Pyle, who previously led the Department of Energy’s transition team, said if the president asked Perry to take on the undesirable task of leading the VA, “I suspect he would accept.”

The current VA Deputy Secretary Thomas Bowman has been mentioned, as well. He’s a Marine vet and a former aide to Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), but for now, it appears he’s not on Trump’s radar.

We’ll have to wait and see who gets the nod. Let’s just hope the next guy is vetted, experienced, and isn’t nominated, simply because he said some nice things about Trump, at one time.

I appreciate that, Sir. Thank you.

2

So this is where you're hiding now! Like Rusty, I believe my time at RedState is at an end. I'm sure this will be a better home for most of us.

5

I am so glad you are here! I hope they (The Resurgent) keep you!

5

I like it better here. It's like pulling teeth to be allowed to comment on RedState.

3

I agree. Shouldn't the people who were so mistreated in the VA health system under the old leadership have some say in who the new VA chief will be...to ensure the same problem won't happen again?

As a Vet, I have only used the medical system once since it was nearly impossible to get in and I have vowed to never go back. I have insurance from my work and thus will reserve the space for others that do not have the ability to obtain care elsewhere.

Glad to see you are here Miss Wright.

3

I have private insurance now, but will need the VA in future. This position is way too important to trust to one of Trump's pets. Didn't he say something about caring about Veterans once or twice on the campaign trail?

p.s. Soldier on, Susan. I'm with you there and here.

2

I'm so glad I will be able to read your commentaries at The Resurgent. RedState's loss is The Resurgent's gain. Thank you for having the courage to stand with true conservatives who do not and will not worship Trump.

4

I don’t see the VA Sec position “needing” someone with previous swamp experience or boba fides (cr: our President). We need a person with strong business acumen and organizational management skills to drain the VA swamp and make the VA lean & mean.

The right person needs to have unrestricted authority to hire/fire, and to reorganize the agency, cut the bloat and start meeting the needs of our sick, injured or disabled vets.

The President and Congress s/b focused on the solution, not the personality.

Thank you, Sir.

The needs of our vets are too crucial to turn over to a chaos candidate. I'm going to assume you have no military experience, and/or no experience with the VA. It's a MASSIVE organization, and it requires someone with a steady hand [not ample time for tweeting].

1

I'm sure you'll find it quite comfortable, here.

4

It is good to see you back Susan...

3

My 86 year old dad is always tempted to go to the VA for "free care". But the delays are very long if not service related and I remind him he has Medicare and good Supplemental insurance. Changes to the VA are required but will need great tact and leadership. Trump as usual put no thought into the choice figuring a Navy doctor without management experience will do just fine. With no vetting or real administration support Dr. Jackson was doomed.

1

Talk to the vets of THIS WAR, not the ones from Vietnam.

We want the VA health system gone.

The entire thing with vet's organizations & the VA is that the 'legacy organizations' from the FDR/Eisenhower/LBJ era are fighting to preserve single-payer VA care.

Whereas those of us who fought in the current wars see that as the problem with the VA, and just want to be able to receive whatever benefit is due through private-sector providers...

1

That's the truth that neither side wants to talk about. The solution to healthcare is the free market. Of course, Washington prefers to quibble over the "proper" way to circumvent free market solutions.

Rumor has it that the President's Limo driver will be the next Transportation Secretary because he complimented Trump on his tie

As a 40 year old vet with a terminal illness I am constantly fighting with both the VA and Medicare. It sure would be nice if they could do something about these things.

Stories