The Clintons and Uranium One is the Russian Smoking Gun

Back in April 2015, Amy Davidson Sorkin at The New Yorker took us through the sordid details of the Uranium One scandal–and it was a scandal even then. She offered five questions.

  1. Was there a qui pro quo?
  2. Did the Clintons meet their disclosure requirements?
  3. Did the Clintons personally profit?
  4. Putting aside who got rich, did this series of uranium deals damage or compromise national security?
  5. Is this cherry-picking or low-hanging fruit?
Comments