The Clintons and Uranium One is the Russian Smoking Gun

Back in April 2015, Amy Davidson Sorkin at The New Yorker took us through the sordid details of the Uranium One scandal–and it was a scandal even then. She offered five questions.

  1. Was there a qui pro quo?
  2. Did the Clintons meet their disclosure requirements?
  3. Did the Clintons personally profit?
  4. Putting aside who got rich, did this series of uranium deals damage or compromise national security?
  5. Is this cherry-picking or low-hanging fruit?
Comments


Susan_Wright
EditorSusan_Wright
New Comment
etbass
30
Steve Berman
EditorSteve Berman
New Comment
Still Jules
David Thornton
EditorDavid Thornton
New Comment
Still Jules
6
Steve Berman
EditorSteve Berman
New Comment
E.E. Bokbok
6
peterheck
Editorpeterheck
New Comment
etbass
10
Susan_Wright
EditorSusan_Wright
New Comment
etbass
7
ClaytonFelts
EditorClaytonFelts
New Comment
JPL
9
Susan_Wright
EditorSusan_Wright
New Comment
Chevy99
5