LGBT Movement: Women Have Penises Too

There’s a reason they call it “transanity” and “transmadness.” And it’s not because people are being rude, dismissive, or offensive.

It’s because the transgender ideology is truly insane madness. To buy into its premises you must first commit yourself to a complete rejection of biology, anatomy, physiology, psychology, and virtually every other field of science (I’m sure geology would figure in somehow).

Secondly, you must learn an entirely new vocabulary – one that is full of made-up words that ultimately mean nothing. And finally, you must become aggressively militant towards anyone who rejects your statements, labeling them bigoted and transphobic.

Call it: how to wreck a culture in three easy steps.

If you’re tempted to believe that I’m being hyperbolic when I say that, simply look at the word salad unleashed by “transgender feminist” Riley J. Dennis in a video that is being heralded by the LGBT movement:

“Some people are making the argument that it’s not cissexist at all to only be attracted to people with one kind of genitals. For example, these people might argue that being attracted to only women with vaginas in no way negatively affects trans people. On the other hand, I would argue that it’s more complicated than that. We all have our implicit biases built into our preferences, and gender isn’t as simple as just the genitals you have.

If you’re a woman who only likes women, go ahead, identify as a lesbian, but some women have penises. And if the fact that some lesbians might be attracted to those women offends you, it’s because you don’t think trans women are real women. I’m trying to show that preferences for women with vaginas over women with penises might be partially informed by the influence of a cissexist society.”

I know you saw it, but let’s restate what Dennis just said: “some women have penises.” This is what I meant when I said that in order to buy into this movement you must first suspend your confidence and belief in science. Transgenderism is predicated around the utter rejection of science as reliable, trustworthy, or dependable. In fact, those who rely on science for their views on transgender behavior are actually “cissexist.” Made-up words.

Think about this: the LGBT movement teaches that your sexual attraction (like homosexual attraction) is who you are – it’s your identity, inborn, and can never change. But it also teaches that your gender (like male or female) is a state of mind and can change fluidly. Both are demonstrably false on the basis of the scientific method.

The conclusion writes itself, and it shouldn’t surprise us. Wise people know that God is the basis of all science and logic. Those who rebel against Him will then necessarily be rebelling against science and logic. That’s who the LGBT movement is and what they promote.

Pushing back is not hate or phobia. It’s sanity.

Comments