“[We] carry multiple concerns in both our head and our heart. Just listening to the concerns around education and climate change, women’s health, child marriage, access to technology, all of those are of course interconnected*. We have to focus on each of them in their interconnectedness.”*
With respect to “sexism” and Islamophobia, the faux scholar had this to say:
CARE USA, the parent organization, is run by Michelle Nunn–the 2014 Democrat candidate to U.S. Senate in Georgia who lost to now-Senator David Perdue (R-GA) by a 53-45% margin. Her father Sam Nunn (D) was a U.S. Senator from Georgia from 1972-1997. CARE USA’s goal is to “save lives, defeat poverty and achieve social justice” across the globe by seeking a “world of hope, tolerance and social justice, where poverty has been overcome and all people live with dignity and security.” It sounds innocent until you peel and arrive at the social justice layers.
What comes across with Chelsea, for lack of a gentler word, is self-regard of an unusual intensity. And the effect is stronger on paper. Unkind as it is to say, reading anything by Chelsea Clinton—tweets, interviews, books—is best compared to taking in spoonfuls of plain oatmeal that, periodically, conceal a toenail clipping.
Can the media and Left please stop giving license to Chelsea Clinton? She’s uninspiring, boring, and not a voice for our generation.