A False Abortion Dilemma

Salon recently contended that a “Twitter thought experiment” conducted by science fiction writer Patrick Tomlinson had exposed the blatant hypocrisy of pro-life advocates, using the following hypothetical scenario:

Whenever abortion comes up, I have a question I’ve been asking for ten years now of the “Life begins at Conception” crowd. In ten years, no one has EVER answered it honestly. It’s a simple scenario with two outcomes. No one ever wants to pick one, because the correct answer destroys their argument. And there IS a correct answer, which is why the pro-life crowd hates the question. Here it is. You’re in a fertility clinic. Why isn’t important. The fire alarm goes off. You run for the exit. As you run down this hallway, you hear a child screaming from behind a door. You throw open the door and find a five-year-old child crying for help. They’re in one corner of the room. In the other corner, you spot a frozen container labeled “1000 Viable Human Embryos.” The smoke is rising. You start to choke. You know you can grab one or the other, but not both before you succumb to smoke inhalation and die, saving no one. Do you A) save the child, or B) save the thousand embryos? There is no “C.” “C” means you all die. In a decade of arguing with anti-abortion people about the definition of human life, I have never gotten a single straight A or B answer to this question. And I never will.

Comments


Susan_Wright
EditorSusan_Wright
New Comment
etbass
30
Steve Berman
EditorSteve Berman
New Comment
Still Jules
David Thornton
EditorDavid Thornton
New Comment
Still Jules
6
Steve Berman
EditorSteve Berman
New Comment
E.E. Bokbok
6
peterheck
Editorpeterheck
New Comment
etbass
10
Susan_Wright
EditorSusan_Wright
New Comment
etbass
7
ClaytonFelts
EditorClaytonFelts
New Comment
JPL
9
Susan_Wright
EditorSusan_Wright
New Comment
Chevy99
5