Russia Uranium Deal: Bill Clinton Met Putin, Media Suddenly Silent Despite Threats on Informant

For months, we have heard little from mainstream media but Russia! Now that The Hill broke major stories directly implicating both Bill and Hillary Clinton regarding an unusual uranium deal with Russia, with money to the Clinton Foundation in return, we have a sudden silence. It's BillaryGate!

Story Headlines

It's finally dawning on people: The Russian nuclear racketeering was an Obama administration scandal, which Congress ignored and the Justice Department investigated but did nothing to stop. Justice looked into the Russian crimes in 2009 and 2010, but waited until 2014 to do anything about it. And even then, it didn't answer any of the larger questions. It can't be ignored any longer.

"According to government documents and recent news reports, the Justice Department had an ongoing criminal investigation for bribery, extortion, money laundering, into officials for a Russian company making purchase of Uranium One," said Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. "That purchase was approved during previous administration and resulted in Russians owning 20% of America's uranium mining capacity."

I still have no idea what the actual story here is, and at this point I am unwilling to say that the Hill’s coverage and Fox’s extrapolations are entirely baseless. If there’s malfeasance here, I want someone to find it, and if Fox finds it first, then good for Fox. But a close look at the story’s evolution and trajectory from 7 p.m. on Wednesday to 7 a.m. on Thursday indicated that investigative journalism is not the network’s only aim and that some of its personalities are far more interested in deflecting attention from President Trump’s troubles than in getting to the bottom of whatever this story actually is. Somehow, I don’t think the next few days of coverage will make it any clearer.

Washington Post:Defends Hillary in Making sense of Russia, uranium and Hillary Clinton.

Hannity is jumping waaay ahead of the facts. So is Breitbart News.The New York Times reported in 2015 that “as the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

”It is virtually impossible to view these donations as anything other than an attempt to curry favor with Clinton. Donations alone do not, however, prove that Clinton was actually influenced by money to vote in favor of the Uranium One sale — or to overlook the FBI investigation. Again, there is no evidence that she even knew about the investigation.

Similarly, it is virtually impossible to view foreign dignitaries' habit of lodging at Trump's Washington hotel as anything other than an attempt to curry favor with the president. Reservations and room service alone do not, however, prove that Trump's foreign policy is actually influenced by money.

Some people willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt are denying Clinton the same courtesy.

Financial Times: Nothing

Wall Street Journal: Nothing

BBC: Nothing

The Guardian: Nothing

CNN: Nothing

Hannity Video

The Real Story

Hannity dramatically overplayed the relevance of the deal from a uranium security aspect.

There is plenty of uranium in the world.The sale itself is not that important. Russia just happens to be one of the few places left that refines uranium.

  • The real deal is not the uranium, it's the kickbacks, the bribes, and the coverups.
  • It's the constant beat of the Russia! Russia! Russia! drums by mainstream media before a sudden sound of silence.
  • It's a rush to judgment over fake news, while looking the other way over serious allegations backed up by with reasonable evidence.
  • It's the suppression of the story by the Obama administration, arguably to protect the Clinton Foundation.
  • To top it off, an FBI Informant was "Threatened" After Offering Details Linking Clinton Foundation to Russian Bribery Case.

An informant who signed a nondisclosure agreement with the FBI faces jail if he says what he knows. WTF? Why is the FBI protecting the Clintons?

Coverage of that aspect of BillaryGate by mainstream media: Zero.

Move along. There's nothing to see. Obviously, on purpose.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

When 145 Million dollars are placed into your Foundation and then your office acts favorably for the entities depositing or "donating" that money, you can try saying you left the decision making to underlings, but most juries will not buy that. Why? Because it's BS and most people see right thru it.

Reason number 5374 why the FBI lost all credibility under James Comey. If the FBI had done their job, even a little bit, Hillary would be in prison like all the other people who committed the same crimes she has. Bill would be in jail for tax evasion, money laundering, and mis-use of (multiple) official offices. Oh, and Loretta Lynch would have been disbarred at the minimum -- more likely in prison for conspiracy -- secret meetings with suspects makes the system look as rigged as it is, and if Ms Lynch were innocent she would have reported the violation immediately (she didn't because she is not innocent -- she is just upset she got caught)

Why is anyone surprised? The mainstream media is doing exactly what they are paid to do. Do people not know the "Fairness Doctrine" was rescinded and CONgress passed the “Smith-Mundt Modernization Act” of 2012, that permits govt propaganda to be used on Americans?

Nothing to see here. The execs at Uranium One decided they needed to send millions to the Clinton Foundation because have such big hearts and there is no better charity to spread the love. Move along.

It is amazing how hearts of charity abandoned the Clinton foundation once Hillary lost. And the dollar distribution of their charity is absurd. But as someone famous once said, at this point, what does it matter?

No one seems to be discussing what Russia's real intent was in the Uranium One matter. The impetus for the acquisition was to secure Russia's near monopoly in enriched uranium, used as a fuel in nuclear reactors. This is why the deal was valuable enough to Rosatom to go through with this sleaziness.

No one is discussing it because it's obvious.

Russia already has a monopoly in uranium.

On first blush I don't think there is any more of a security risk to having a Russian company own 20% of current US uranium mining than there is of Venezuela owning a bunch of US gas stations. It's just business and the uranium is still in the US, only some of the profits head for Russia. It's just money. What is more concerning is whether bribes were offered and accepted, because bribery and collusion is illegal. Russians owning US assets is not illegal (although to listen to the news you wouldn't think so), no more so that US citizens owning Russian assets is illegal (which you might also suspect given the news. Hey, McDonald's has restaurants in Moscow! Where's the news coverage?) The whole issue boils down to only one thing: Did the Clintons accept money in exchange for favorable treatment from Russian business persons? If so, both the Clintons and the Russian business men (and the Canadians involved) should face trial. Who owns the business now really is a mute point beyond any possible collusion.

false