Quantum Computers Will Make Even "Strong" Passwords Worthless

The race is on to perfect quantum computing. It will make your bank passwords and all existing security methods useless.

The Hutch Report has a fascinating 44-page PDF on Quantum Computing.

If perfected, existing methods of encryption will cease to work. Your bank account password and passwords to cryptocurrencies will easily be hackable.

The ability to break the RSA coding system will render almost all current channels of communication insecure.

This is a national security threat.

The benefits are also huge: Quantum computers will be superior at hurricane detection, airplane design, and in searching DNA for markers to help find cures for diseases such as Autism, Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s.

Classical Computers

Classical computers use strings of 0’s and 1’s with a single digit a "bit" and strings of bits a "byte". A bit is either a one or a zero.

Excerpts from the Hutch report now follow. I condensed 44 pages to a hopefully understandable synopsis of the promise and problems of quantum computing.

Quantum Background

Quantum computing does not use bits, but uses qubits which can be one, zero, or both zero and one at the same time. This state or capability of being both is called superposition. Where it gets even more complex is that qubits also exhibit a property called entanglement. Entanglement is an extraordinary behaviour in quantum physics in which particles, like qubits, share the same state simultaneously even when separated by large distance.

In comparison, a classic computer using bits of zero and one can only store one state at a time and can represent 2ⁿ states where n is the number of bits. In the case of two bits, this would be 2² which is four states: 00, 01, 10, 11.

A normal computer would require four operations to examine each state. Two qubits could store the four states at one time. When the number of states are low there is not a major processing difference.

If you extend the computation to 32 bits - used to store a typical integer value in modern computing, 2(raised to)32 = 4,294,967,296. That's over 4 billion states!

As the number of possible state combinations increases, the difference in processing time between quantum computers using qubits and a classic computer using classic bits, increases exponentially. The following chart depicts this well showing that 20 qubits can represent simultaneously over 1 million permutations of classical bits.

Quantum computing is in its infancy and is probably comparable to where classic computer technology was in the 1960s and 1970s where it took an entire room to house a computer.

The qubits are extremely sensitive to interference and one of the main challenges in constructing quantum computers is creating an environment with no interference and enabling stable qubit states. To achieve stable environments, the majority of quantum computer platforms require vacuum states as well as superconductivity. Superconductivity, in turn, requires cryogenic cooling (e.g. refrigeration to extreme low temperatures).

In addition, each quantum computer must be specifically built to run a specific algorithm. To change or run a different algorithm requires rebuilding the computer. Two of the better known algorithms built to date are Grover's Algorithm, which uses quantum computing to conduct searches on unstructured databases much more quickly and efficiently than a classic computer; and Shor's Algorithm which is an algorithm for finding prime factors.​

Although the U.S. currently remains at the forefront of quantum information science, their lead is slipping quickly as other nations step up efforts to get there first. China holds the top two positions in the Top 500 list of the world's fastest computers, and the Chinese understand very well the potential power that quantum computing promises. For this reason, they have allocated extensive funding towards the goal of producing a functional quantum computer before anyone else. On 37 hectares (nearly 4 million square feet) in Hefei, Anhui Province, China is building a $10 billion research center for quantum applications. This news comes on the heels of the world’s first video call made via quantum-encrypted communications and the completion of a quantum-encrypted fibre optic trunk cable.

Factoring Large Numbers Very Rapidly (Shor's Algorithm)

[Mish Note: current encryption methods involve multiplication of extremely large prime numbers. Bitcoin "mining" rewards the computer that solves such mathematical puzzles first.]

Utilizing a specialized algorithm such as mathematician Peter Shor’s, a quantum computer can compute large integer factoring in polynomial time versus classical computing’s sub-exponential time. Therefore, quantum computers have the ability to solve, in a quick time frame, problems that were previously too difficult to solve in any reasonable time. Typically, these are problems involving extraordinarily large amounts of data or large amounts of possible combinations.


Large aircraft companies are working to develop quantum algorithms that will greatly reduce research time in achieving aeronautical efficiencies. For example, the potential to predict the flow of air over a wing--something that would take classical computers more than 7 years of computing time. This would enable the development of robust, efficient aircraft with low noise and CO2 emission to be achieved in a much shorter time period. It currently takes several years for engineers to test the design of an airplane wing and model airflow at different angles and speeds. A good design will reduce operating costs, save fuel, which in turn means less carbon emissions.

Secure Communication Technology

Once quantum computers become readily available, today’s security encryption protocols will be easily broken. Quantum-resistant and improved cyber security techniques are being developed. Therefore, the impact of cyber-attacks on artificial intelligence and major databases and other sensitive systems may be significantly reduced.

Weather Forecasting

The flow of air, water or other liquids are the foundation of many practical applications. The current underlying models are based on Navier-Stokes equations which describe the motion of viscous fluid substances and are extremely challenging problems in computational physics. Quantum computer simulators could potentially provide models for a large number of areas from turbulence and flow in industrial furnaces to the protection of low-lying countries for sea-water flooding.

Medicine and Healthcare

Quantum computing's ability to model molecular interactions at an atomic level will allow us to gain insight towards developing new medicines and a greater understanding of diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s, and Parkinson’s. In order to find breakthroughs for treatments, it is crucial to understand the structure of proteins and how they fold. Simulating protein folding is extremely expensive in terms of time and cost, which include access to supercomputing facilities. A quantum computer should be able to work out the best possible treatment for a given patent, achieving not only a more precise result but, in theory, much faster as well.

Mish Comments

Quantum computers offer many promises. They also pose security threats.

The first country that succeeds could hack into bank accounts or the pentagon.

How close are we? I have no idea. Nor do I know if they will ever work, but I strongly believe they will.

This I do know: It is a national security threat if China perfects quantum computing first.

I initially wrote, "A quantum computer could also mine nearly every bitcoin," but a reader disputes that. See the addendum below.


Reader ThroughNothing adds these thoughts.

Hey Mish, thanks for your posts, I’ve been a longtime reader and have gained a lot of value and education from your posts. I do want to point out that there is currently no known quantum algorithm that can “break” sha256, which is the algorithm that bitcoin uses for mining. Additionally, if you don’t use a bitcoin address more than once, the private key to your coins remains “quantum resistant”, because your public key (which can be used by a quantum computer to “factor” your large number) is not revealed to the network until you spend coins from an address. Until that point, only a hash of your public key is provided, which, similarly to sha256 hashes mentioned above, cannot be “broken” by known quantum algorithms. I know this may be technical for your audience, but I think those are important details. For my background, I’ve been in computer software and security/cryptography for over 12 years now. Thanks again!

Thanks to reader Jay, an equation was modified as follows: In comparison, a classic computer using bits of zero and one can only store one state at a time and can represent 2ⁿ states where n is the number of bits. In the case of two bits, this would be 2² which is four states: 00, 01, 10, 11.

If you extend the computation to 32 bits - used to store a typical integer value in modern computing, 2(raised to)32 = 4,294,967,296. That's over 4 billion states!

Mike "Mish" Shedlock

Meanwhile, back at quantum computing: I'm concerned that there may be a lot less there than is being hoped for. The qubit is a neat, (and extremely expensive) storage trick, but it looks suspiciously like just that...storage, very fast storage. And even if the storage access time and it's route through ALU could be magically driven to zero, the vast majority of the compute cycle time lies elsewhere. Also, don't dazzle me with long vectors. If I'm a biochemist bench tech tracking a cancer beast and want to know every net biological leaf and twig movement within a ten foot radius, it won't help to give me north America.

We have too many liberal arts majors in this country (many of them become left wing journalists & lawyers!) and not enough STEM majors. This is why we can't fill jobs and need H1-B's from China and India to fill jobs in Silicon Valley. China is on top of this and graduates many, many times more engineers then the USA and they have a focus on math and science deep ingrained into their culture now. Having a work force that figures out stuff like Quantum computing first is going to so key going forward. We really need a massive focus very early on math and science in the US. The lack of this has always worried me.

“It is not that they lack in money management, it is that they primarily lack in money. ” ~ whirlaway

...and that lack of money results in lack of political representation as political power in the US is a commodity to be bought and sold. No money, no clout.

One great potential of Quantum computer is homogeneous storage. Since a single storage unit can contain 2 values, it opens the possibility of storing bit ID's along with the data itself. Meaning you could have a liquid or a gas-like substance with no fixed structure containing data. The obstacle to overcome though is fragility of containment. We need qbits that can exist at room temperature in standard atmosphere and such promise is farther off than nuclear fusion.

equation correctly modified as follows: For comparison, a classic computer using bits of zero and one can only store one state at a time and can represent 2ⁿ states where n is the number of bits. In the case of two bits, this would be 2² which is four states: 00, 01, 10, 11.

Mtngoat is correct. The jobs of the future require a greater emphasis on STEM education. Having said that, I will repeat that the best way forward for every country is to continually upgrade the skills and education of all citizens. The current practice of “finishing” your education and training around age 25 and then expecting that to carry you through life, is a recipe for disaster, which appears to be playing out in the US and many other countries.

My email server uses strong passwords and if one wrong login attempt is passed it automatically bans the IP address of the quantum computer that tried to hack into it. The quantum computer is totally at the mercy of all the rest of the non-quantum systems it wishes to attack. If you didn't ban IP addresses at all then the bottleneck would be the network bandwidth and latency required for the trial and error cracking attempts which would mean that the quantum computer would be no quicker than a decent 8 core home computer.

Question on bitcoin being 'hackable': Sorry if this is dumb but wouldn't bitcoin be hackable because with just one (the first) quantum computer you would single handedly control the largest CPU pool ? Per the bitcoin white paper "As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers." With one quantum computer that condition would be trivially broken, no?

Heh mish do you think the quantum computer can provide a cure for the common cold? It seems this has never been solved. I am sure its included in the 44 page paper.

existing encryption is constantly being rendered useless and replaced. So what?